The Battle Against Human Trafficking in Europe : Policy Evaluation

The Battle Against military man Trafficking in europium Policy Evaluation Samira Misra Webster University schema This paper hears to evaluate the policies of the atomic number 63an meat direct at combatting kind-hearted trafficking in all its ferments. The new plans of the atomic number 63an delegating and the unify Nations ar presented, and the rationale lavatory them is scrutinized. interrogation shows that the European sum of money recognizes the problem of charitable trafficking as a gross(a) denial of t ender-hearted rights, and proposes stageionion to give to justice the responsible persons.The European substances status is one base on the pillars of majority rule freedom, transp bency, the legality, and security. This paper argues that the aforementioned perspective is non adapted in ameliorating the situation. It proposes a broader approach to the verbalism and design of a general strategy, encompassing the expel ca dos cardinal homo trafficki ng, as hearty. The chief weaknesses of live insurance policy appear to be its implementation, and EU wide co-ordination.With the identification of these weaknesses, this paper proposes substantive reform by regulatory get a want withncies for real execute against the catastrophic reality of the trafficking trade. Ana, a girl from Quito, Ecuador fell in recognize with her husband at the young age of 20. What she thought would be the best finding of her life, ended up fartinging her to keep in a nightm be. Her husband effected at a brothel in Quito, covert his profession from Ana. Ana left her husband, along with her toddler, and travel in with her mother jobless. She soon met the possessor of a small salon, a dame who would talk about Europe, and the lifestyle of the slew on that point.Ana quickly became starry-eyed and accepted an turn to move to Paris to reap money. She was all in all unawargon of what lay ahead. When she r some(prenominal)lyed Paris, she came to know that no job awaited her, other than prostituting herself on the streets to tolerate hold her debts for her trip to Paris. Her pimps self-collected most of the money she made, and trip out was in addition risky as the trafficking networks were brassatic and scour connected with righteousness enforcement. Ana did non reverberation to Ecuador for three years, and lived her life, risking it all single twenty-four hours just to make ends get together. This is only ne of thousands of horror stories of the victims of gracious trafficking (Knierim, 2012). According to the linked Nations Office of Drugs & Crime (UNODC), mankind trafficking is delineate as the The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the yell of power or of a perplex of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the cons ent of a person having control over some other person, for the decide of developing.Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of versed exploitation, laboured labour or services, thralldom or practices similar to sla very, servitude or the removal of organs. (UNODC, 2012). The turn on trafficking persistence has be take place the hot growing industry in the world, and offenders conduct to slip in the midst of the cracks of the legislative system (UNHCR, 2010). Data indicates that the number of trafficked victims detected in 2006, in West and Central Europe was 7,300 (UNODC, 2006, p. 229).Transcrime suggests a multiplier of 20 for every victim detected, which means that it is estimated that the actual statistic is 20 cartridge holders what is kn proclaim, This leads to a attainable statistic of 140,000 victims in Europe. It is hard to say what should go greater concern, the staggering numbers (which ar a co nservative estimation), or the fact that the trafficking industry continues to boom. Most trafficked victims in Europe come from Balkan countries, and from Russia. Europe likewise shows the largest number of nationalities of victims than some(prenominal) other region of the world.Victims be recruited into the conjure up trafficking trade with force, misrepresentation, false promises and coercion. Young, vulnerable women atomic number 18 lured into traps by means of promises of opportunities much(prenominal)(prenominal) as jobs, study abroad programs, modelling c arers, vacations and the like. Research shows that acquaintances, friends or relatives largely conduct recruitment within Europe. (UNODC, 2010, p. 225) serviceman trafficking is a late complex, and multi-faceted issue. It has three main(prenominal) dimensions wicked, humankind rights, and socio-economic.In fellowship to in effect combat human trafficking in the European Union, measures that tackle all aspects motivation to be devised and implemented. This essay will seek to illustrate that the European policies gum olibanum utmost reserve taken a very limited plentypoint to the challenges of trafficking, and assume to course their vision to incorporate solutions to the root causes of the sex trade. In the branch part of this paper, the policies (to date) to cope trafficking will be run intod, as substantially as the rationale they stem from.The scrap part will identify the main problems with these policies, and propose changes necessary for the EU to powerfully continue the prevalence of trafficking. European Union Policy European counsel In the past decade, the widespread problem of human trafficking has gained increasing media attention. However, this rise in media reportage does not imply an increase causal agent for measures to be taken. sooner, it triggers a false sense experience that enough is being to combat trafficking. only still, few nations remain immune to its unfavorable effects. Most countries are source countries, transportation countries, or destination countries.It is important to tonus that within Europe, every nation has its own policy reliable example against the issue, but scrutinizing each system is beyond the scope of this research paper. For the argument, which this essay seeks to propose, it is much useful to examine the policies of European organizations dedicated solely to trafficking. The tidings will be a chronological presentation of the steps taken by the European Union. The role of the European guardianship (EC) is to propose edict in the incarnate amuse of the EU, as sound as assist in its implementation.Usually, the commission initiates legislation to meet requirements nether EU treaties. In May 2003, under the Brussels contract on human trafficking, a policy framework was introduced, which accept the importance of addressing the human rights violations of trafficking that threatened the freedom and security of victims. It called for accommodative activeness on regional, national, and international levels by governments, regulatory bodies and NGOs. on that pointafter, in 2004 a EU directive was issued directional2004/81), and introduced a reflection consummation in which victims could recover without being deported for vicious migration. If they decided to cooperate with enforcement officials and provided concrete fosterage about their traffickers, they would be granted a temporary planetary house permit by which they could pursue education and career opportunities (European Commission, 2004, p. 261). Although the EC released some policy statements between 2004 and 2011, in that respect were very few noticeable changes in strategy. More recently, the EC has taken a supposedly comprehensive initiative against this phenomenon.In 2011, the European Parliament established a framework outlining legal penitentiary measures concerning trafficking offences, as well as prev entive measures to aid victims (Directive2011/36/EU). Under this policy, offenders of trafficking (including partial participants aiding in the process) were win to five to ten years of incarceration depending on the crimes they perpetrate. Further more, the Directive stated, Member States whitethorn decide not to prosecute or impose penalties on victimsof trafficking in human beings for their contact in reprehensible activities which they halt been compelled to commit. (European Commission, 2011, p. 01). The aftercare procedures consisted of the possible provision of accommodation, medical care, and hearing and translation services. Children were involve to receive mental service and access to education. All victims were required to be protected sufficiently from abusers and trauma. snag measures highlighted by Directive2011/36/EU include education and awareness initiatives, and training for natural faithfulness in identification of offenders and victims. The main g ivement in this directive from the last reading was that it had broadened the definition of trafficking to include more forms of exploitation.The Directive2011/36/EU demonstrates an approach largely come to with the criminal and human rights violation aspects of human trafficking, but pre borderits the circumstantial aspect (the socio-economic conditions which lead mint to trafficking). According to the Directives instinct, trafficking of persons is first and foremost an absolute negation of introductory human rights for the immense physical and psychological abuse endured by victims. Secondly, it is a criminal offense (or some(prenominal)) on the part of the ffenders, as they partake in heinous crimes of violence, oppression, and cruelty, which downplay the worth of a human life. The in style(p) strategy was released in June 2012, when the EC dive out the, EU dodging towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings (2012-2016). This strategy fundamentally invest s send detailed concrete steps to meet the aims of the previous Directive2011/36/EU. Main objectives of the docket are identification and vindication of victims, increased legal action against offenders, enhanced coordination and cooperation of states in policy implementation, and increased preventive measures.The EU dodging towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings burn only be analyze conceptually for flaws as it has just been put into place. However, disrespect periodic revisions, it is clear that the ECs view stay essentially unchanged. The outlook continues to be concerned with uprightness enforcement and organise crime (European Commission, The EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings, p. 4-6). united NationsOther than the EC, the United Nations in any case recognizes human trafficking as a pressing concern for the international community, and acknowledges its duty to mobilize Member States to act against it. In 2002, the UN T IP Protocol ( withal know as Palermo Protocol) was adopted by the United Nations to prevent, suppress, and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children (U. N, 2002, p. 1). In December 2003, this protocol came into effect, signed by 117 countries. The UNODC is responsible for upholding the Palermo protocol.Additionally, the UNODC launched its Blue Heart Campaign, directed at increasing awareness and involvement in combatting the trafficking trade. Evaluation Sex trafficking is a complex issue, which requires an in-depth analysis and understanding of the discordant dimensions of the problem. The phenomenon of trafficking is immoral and unethical on legion(predicate) counts, and thitherfore the fight against it must confront them all. After a closer cleverness into the sex trade, it throne be reiterated that at that place are socio-economic, criminal and uman rights standards our society is ground on, all of which human trafficking neglects. This section identifie s the place loopholes in current anti-trafficking procedures. Data exhibition A rather significant issue, which inherently cripples the efficiency of policy-making, is the wishing of data on human trafficking. This expresses a concern not with the content of the policies, but rather with the construction of policies, as knowledge of the nature of trafficking remains incomplete. Concrete, reliable data on human trafficking is an essential basis for all good programs, interventions, policy and legislation.Without this data it is not possible to know the extent or the square nature of the trafficking problem, nor understand the complexity of the issues involved. As a give, practitioners and policy-makers are unable to act and react appropriately and effectively(International affection for Migration Policy Development, 2008, p. 205). There are several(prenominal)(prenominal) reasons for the dearth of empirical data and statistics. possibly the most noteworthy reason is the un un biddenness of victims to come former and report the crimes committed against them.This is because they business for their personal safety, or fear being prosecuted for crimes such as dirty in-migration, prostitution or drug abuse. In extreme cases, victims are monitored by offenders and do not draw the access to law enforcement. Other contributing factors are obstacles in legal frameworks, poor data assemblage methodologies, and reluctance of agencies to share their information. This undermines the foundation upon which policies are devised. Approach to combatting trafficking EC policies against trafficking largely ignore problems such as sex inequality, ladder and class differences.The International Labor giving medication (ILO) estimates that 43% of trafficking victims are used for forced commercial sexual exploitation, of which 98% are female (ILO, 2008, p. 3). Although Europe has long recognized the importance of gender equality, it does not view the problem of human tra fficking as vocalisation of gender inequality. Trafficking predominantly affects women, and it is because women are disadvantage compared to men in society, that they are more susceptible to becoming victims. The leading cause of trafficking is the desperate need of potential victims to take to the woods from poor standards of donjon.Presently, the EU is not pickings sufficient measures to support the empowerment of disfavor (impoverished, uneducated, ethnic minorities, etc. ). The harsh EU migration and border laws limit the options women begin for better prospects. This can (sometimes) be the reason for women desire illegitimate and unregulated forms of escape. The argument propositioned here, is that thus far, the EU has taken a unkindly view of trafficking, and has designed policies aimed at short- confines band aid solutions, and has failed to devise long term strategies to eliminate the conditions which cause people to resort to risky and life-threatening behavior.In addition, these short- term policies are not gender antiphonal either, and lack mechanisms to help women (specifically) overcome their cogency to such crimes. Human trafficking is a get out of a chain of events based on unjust brotherly and economic environments, to which women a great deal fall victim. Women are physically weaker and hence more vulnerable to physical harm. In addition, the cultural and societal norms (e. g. gender stereotypes, and tender roles) that surround most women aggravate the likeliness of the exposure to crimes against them.As of now, gender equality policies break mainly to EU citizens, whereas most victims of trafficking are non- EU citizens. It is counterproductive to stomach policies seeking to ensure equal rights, which fail to provide to outsiders (even illegal immigrants). Current anti-trafficking measures have been say to be collateral damage, as they explicitly authorize government action against victims such as deportation, and prosecu tion for slight crimes (Uhl, 2010, p. 122). These ostensibly supportive measures are in effect punitive for women and discourage them from seeking help.Surprisingly, nearly half of trafficking recruiters are also women. Female victims, desperate to find an escape from the unfathomable abuse, become exploiters over time (UNODC, 2010, p. 227). Policies addressing the socio-economic problems faced by women in areas of unemployment, well-being, education, immigration etc. would empower them, and prove more productive in tackling the issue from preventive, punitive and rehabilitative aspects. In essence, the European Union fails to recognize that human trafficking is partially the end result of societal gender inequalities.Although there are separate initiatives battling gender inequality, under social agendas, the European Union can kill two birds with one rock and roll by incorporating these measures in fighting trafficking as well. Rathgeber (2002) asserts, Integrated and operation al structures need to be developedto counteract the feminization of leanness (p. 163). Academic critics of European trafficking policies (such as Rathgeber and Askola) confirm integration of strategy and procedures to overcome social gaps such as economic class, gender, or race. LegislationThe next key shortcoming in the European policy is the implementation of legislation. Although laws have been passed deeming trafficking of humans as punishable, few nations have used them to convict perpetrators. The implementation of the law so far has been lacks, which could only have further discouraged victims to come forward and testify. Despite the European Commissions view of trafficking from a crime and justice standpoint, enforcement officers are not equipped with the proper tools for identification and surety of victims, and not all legal institutions are equipped with legislative frameworks.Frequently, victims are offered through front businesses such as truelove salons, massage pa rlors or escort services, which make it hard for police officers to diagnose as trafficking rings. The United States Department of Health & Human Services (2008) reports that often victims do not consider themselves to be victims, because they are incognizant of their rights and are kept too disjointed from communication to be informed of the action they can take. In addition, in eastern European countries, as well as a few others, trafficking rings are so well connected, that they branch as far out as law enforcement authorities.This could mean that police officials are willing to either turn a wile eye to, or participate in criminal activity. In order to have legislation actually serve its purpose, European policies must categorize concrete ship canal for the identification of offenders and victims. uprightness enforcement agencies absorb that there are clear, visible signs of trafficking activity such as locked doors, low sanitary standards, aforesaid(prenominal) working an d living space, etc. Rather than relying on superficial symptoms like these, Uhl (2010) suggests that victims can be better detected through a profile, or characteristics based on demography and behavior (p. 23). Identification ties back into being able to recognize that peculiarly vulnerable slice of society- uneducated and scantness stricken. Legal measures should also guarantee the protection of victims from criminal prosecution and not kick the bucket it to the judgment of the enforcement officer, or fortune. The current Directive does not state this as a requirement, and these grey areas are considerable obstructions to effective carrying into action of justice. According to the UNODC, law enforcement bodies also do not place sufficient priority on charging offenders, as they are aware that it rarely results in a conviction.A large majority of victims and witnesses are deported, or locked up for crimes, which makes their statements unusable in lawcourt proceedings. In add ition, offenders disappear under the radar and are known to flee the expanse as well. The reverse of legislation is result of other shortcomings, rather than a shortcoming in itself. Each inefficiency snowballs to make the movement of legislative tools futile. Harmonization It seems sound to assume that the European Commissions policies reflect uniform standards between nations because they claim to act in the interest of the European Union.However, this is not the case. Although, the EC has the identical anti-trafficking strategy for all its members, different states interpret and enforce the policy differently, and some states only when do not uphold the EU standard. The absence of co-ordination and co-operation is yet another mood in which convicted offenders escape investigation in court. The initial intention of the strategy is bemused across borders, as states continue to pick and choose slices of strategy to administer.This is principally interdependent on the level of regulation in each country, as well as on national priorities. In several source countries, especially in the Balkans, depravation is widespread and dishonest officials often work with traffickers or turn a screen door eye to unlawful acts (Rathgeber, 2002, p. 153). By definition, what constitutes trafficking also varies from country to country. Some definitions include several forms of exploitation (e. g. bad labor conditions), term others only deal with more staring(a) forms.Therefore, the Directive, which is supposed to tackle the same form of trafficking in a dependable dash across nations, ends up being translated to eccentric specific national standards such as border control, labor conditions, migration law, and sexual pietism (Askola, 2007, p. 214). A tentative solution is the establishment of a regulatory legislative automobile trunk in charge of enforcing the correct activity of strategies of the European Commission. Its branches should be established in Member States to regularly monitor execution in accordance with the EU standards.Moreover, the strategies need to avoid ambiguities, which encourage nations to modify implementation. The Directive2004/81 allows for authorities to determine whether temporary residence should be granted or not, based on specific circumstances. In having such loopholes, enforcement bodies become more occupied with the finis of these circumstances, and less with the primary objective of assistance and rehabilitation. European countries have shown limited understanding of trafficking as an issue in itself, despite all the research and analysis there is available on the subject.When examining European Commission approaches to social and economic discrepancies across EU nations, it is evident that there are programs in place, which are built with the primary purpose of establishing equality, and eradicating hierarchy based on gender and class. However, these steps have been relatively ineffective, and lack synch ronization across borders. Trafficking is one of the outcomes of the failure of the EUs measures against poverty, income inequality, lack of welfare and benefit programs, and social services for children, education opportunities, psychotherapy and medical assistance, and rehabilitation.It is these dire circumstances that create desperation for money and through it, the prospect of an improvement in living standards. Conclusion Human trafficking is a problem, interlinked to several existing social, political, geographical and economic disadvantages. In order to formulate a comprehensive response to control the proliferation of trafficking, and the tragic outcomes on victims, the European Union must pay heed to the social and economic root causes.The strategies of the past decade reflect a generally conservative approach, as well as one that deals with trafficking as a problem in it, rather than a problem resulting from several other problems. There is little real improvement in the p rogressive refinement of EU policies. The European Commission has recognized the scope of the problem, and necessity to combat human trafficking, yet the measures are proving unsuccessful. Rather than portraying human trafficking as merely a variation of organized crime, it is critical to acknowledge its social, political, economic and criminal aspects as well.Human trafficking is an outcome of failed social measures, ones that are not directed to fighting the conditions from which it arises. synchronicity and coordination between European nations are the first steps to remodeling strategy design and enhancing the influence of legislation. Gender sensitivity and assistance to women should be a top priority in EU policy, to help women shift from their poor position in society. From an evaluative perspective, until these actions are taken, we are likely to see repetitive adjustments to current EU policies with little development in the right direction.References Askola, H. (2007 ). Violence against women, trafficking, and migration in the European Union. European Law Journal, 13(2), 204-217. inside10. 1111/j. 1468-0386. 2007. 00364. x Cochintu, I. , Tutunaru, L. , Stoicu, N. , & Valea, D. (2011). International cooperation against human trafficking. discriminative Current, 14(2), 78-86. Nieuwenhuys, C. , & Pecoud, A. (2007). Human trafficking, information campaigns, and strategies of migration control. American behavioral Scientist, 50(12), 1674-1695. Rathgeber, C. (2002). The victimization of women through human trafficking An moment of war?.European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 10(2/3), 152-163. doi10. 1163/157181702401475340 Skrivankova, K. (2006). Combating trafficking in human beings. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 20(1/2), 229-232. doi10. 1080/13600860600705135 Surtees, R. (2008). handbook on anti-trafficking data collection in south-eastern Europe Developing Regional Criteria. Uhl, B. (2010). scattered in implementation? Human rights empty words and violations A critical review of current European anti-trafficking policies. Security & Human Rights, 21(2), 119-126. carry out against trafficking in human beings. 47 Countries 800 one million million million citizens Council of Europe. N. p. , n. d. Web. 10 Nov. 2012. . Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social direction and the committee of the regions. (2012). European Commission Strategy Directive 2011/36/EU of the European parliament and of the Council On preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its Victims and replacing Council Framework close 2002/629/JHA. 2011). Official Journal of the European Union. Europe & Me Human Trafficking in Europe. Europe & Me Magazine . N. p. , n. d. Web. 14 Dec. 2012. . La Strada International. La Strada International. N. p. , n. d. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. . Trafficking in persons to Europe for sexual exploitation. (2011). Trends in Organized Crime, 14(2/3), 224-234. doi10. 1007/s12117-011-9136-y